Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 318/2014

Case between T.N.Radhakrishnan et al vs A.I.Valsala et al regarding civil suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are T.N.Radhakrishnan and others, while the defendants are A.I.Valsala and others. The suit was dismissed as not pressed due to both sides being absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as not pressed since both parties were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as not pressed since both parties were absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.N.Radhakrishnan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
G.Sivarajan
Party Age
69
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V.Jose
Party Age
63
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.A.Subramanian
Party Age
61
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivasankaran
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.I.Valsala
Party Age
53
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudeer
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.N.Vishnu Namboothiri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.N.Elayath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.T.Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joe Pollayil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Roshin Ipe Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.N.Radhakrishnan et al vs A.I.Valsala et al regarding civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between T.N.Radhakrishnan et al vs A.I.Valsala et al regarding civil suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won