Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1188/2014

Case between T.K. Sathyababu vs Sarada Wilson et al regarding IA No. 4576/2016

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.K. Sathyababu is the plaintiff requesting an interim application regarding a property dispute. The defendants are Sarada Wilson and Santhosh Wilson, related to a deceased individual, who are counter petitioners in this case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the interim application, appointing an advocate commissioner and a surveyor to assist with the property dispute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim application allowed; advocate commissioner and surveyor appointed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interim application, appointing an advocate commissioner and a surveyor to assist with the property dispute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The applicant has made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The applicant has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K. Sathyababu
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarada Wilson
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh Wilson
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Murlidharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Smt.Shelja
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission granted for the advocate commissioner to visit the property.
Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of advocate commissioner and surveyor for the property.
Evidence:
Advocate Smt.Shelja is appointed as the advocate commissioner and Sri.Sajeev.O.S is appointed as the surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Deposit of batta for the advocate commissioner and surveyor.
Evidence:
The applicant is directed to deposit batta of Rs.4,500/- to the advocate commissioner and Rs.3,000/- to the surveyor within 30 days.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Filing of a memo regarding the remittance of batta.
Evidence:
The applicant is also directed to file memo before the court regarding remittance of batta.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Submission of report by the advocate commissioner.
Evidence:
The advocate commissioner is directed to file the report on or before 01/08/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the evidence considered.
Reference:
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the plaint as part of the evidence considered.
Reference:
Document Type: Written Statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the written statement as part of the evidence considered.
Reference:
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The advocate commissioner is directed to file the report, which will assist in resolving the disputes.
Reference:
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The commissioner is directed to notify both sides before visiting the property.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.K. Sathyababu vs Sarada Wilson et al regarding IA No. 4576/2016
Case Code Year
Case between T.K. Sathyababu vs Sarada Wilson et al regarding IA No. 4576/2016

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won