Case Summary
Tiyalal.S. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Sakunthala.S. and others. The court is addressing a delay in issuing notice that could affect the outcome of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the first defendant from creating documents related to the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff. This prevents the first defendant from creating any documents related to the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court is satisfied that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court is satisfied that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purposed of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the 1st defendant/counter petitioner from creating any document due to the undue influence of defendants 2 and 3 over the plaint schedule property until 02/12/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Tiyalal.S.
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sakunthala.S.
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil Lal.S
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arunlal.S.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and other related documents.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R. Girija Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the 1st defendant from creating any document due to the undue influence of defendants 2 and 3 over the plaint schedule property until 02/12/2025.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the 1st defendant/counter petitioner from creating any document due to the undue influence of defendants 2 and 3 over the plaint schedule property until 02/12/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Tiyalal.S. vs Sakunthala.S. et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Tiyalal.S. vs Sakunthala.S. et al regarding injunction