Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 40/2024

Case between Tincy Francis et al vs K.P Joseph regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Tincy Francis and K. P Francis as plaintiffs, who are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendant K.P Joseph regarding an alleged right of easement over certain property. The defendant has filed a petition to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to conduct a local inspection related to these claims.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition has been partly allowed to permit an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of an expert engineer to conduct a local inspection on specified points.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner to conduct a local inspection
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition has been partly allowed to permit an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of an expert engineer to conduct a local inspection on specified points.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The points raised for inspection were deemed essential to determine the case, and were specific and beyond previous reports.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The points raised for inspection were deemed essential to determine the case, and were specific and beyond previous reports.
Supporting Evidence
The questions sought to be determined in the petition are specific and vast and are going beyond the report that has been filed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is partly allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tincy Francis
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. P Francis
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P Joseph
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Sunny Menachery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. V Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. J Hari Sankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raju V. Mathu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The petition is partly allowed to appoint an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is partly allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Tincy Francis et al vs K.P Joseph regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner
Case Code Year
Case between Tincy Francis et al vs K.P Joseph regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won