Case Summary
The plaintiff, Thomas C Kondody, is seeking to realize the outstanding balance for construction work completed for the defendant, Suma K R. The dispute arises from an agreement for constructing a residence, with the plaintiff claiming the defendant has not paid the full amount due.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay ₹2,44,000/- with interest at 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding balance for construction work.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was not rebutted.
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was not rebutted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was not rebutted.
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was not rebutted.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,44,000/- (Rupees two lakhs forty four thousand only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thomas C Kondody
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suma K R
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
A1 15.12.2023 Labour Agreement
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N Gopalakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sindhu Gopalakrishanan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ordered the defendants to pay the plaintiff the sum of ₹2,44,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 2,44,000/- (Rupees two lakhs forty four thousand only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Labour Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this document to establish the terms of payment and obligations of the parties in the construction agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thomas C Kondody vs Suma K R regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Thomas C Kondody vs Suma K R regarding realisation of money