Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 110/2015

Case between Thennal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Faizal et al regarding arrest petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-07-08
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 2 days
Case Code No.
110
Case Closed
Wed, 07/08/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thennal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. filed a case against Faizal and Sulaiman seeking execution of a decree through an arrest petition. The court dismissed the petition for default due to respondents being abroad.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the execution petition for default as the respondents were reported to be abroad.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed for Default
Case Type
Execution Petition - Arrest
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition for default as the respondents were reported to be abroad.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

No steps taken for issuing notice to respondents. Respondents are reported to be abroad. E.P is for arrest. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thennal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Faizal
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaiman
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.V.Sindhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Faizal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for 2
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution Petition Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed for Default
Description:
Execution petition dismissed for default due to respondents being abroad.
Evidence:
No steps taken for issuing notice to respondents. Respondents are reported to be abroad. E.P is for arrest. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition - Arrest
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/10/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/08/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Punnekkat Thanka regarding Decree
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Execution Proceeding Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won