Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 91/2014

Case between Thekkeveettil Beepathu vs C.Saseedharan et al regarding delivery of property

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Biju.V.G
Order Date
2015-04-09
Duration
1 year, 0 months, 25 days
Case Code No.
91
Case Closed
Thu, 04/09/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thekkeveettil Beepathu filed a case against C.Saseedharan and others for delivery of property, which was decided in favor of the decree holder resulting in the delivery of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The property delivery petition was decided in favor of the decree holder, resulting in the delivery of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Delivery of property
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The property delivery petition was decided in favor of the decree holder, resulting in the delivery of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Delivery of the property affected. Delivery affected. Petition is closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thekkeveettil Beepathu
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.Saseedharan
Party Age
43
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.Suresh
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedharan
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabhakaran
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.Vasudevan
Party Age
57
Relation
Son of Ganapathi Chettiyar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Devaki
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lakshmi
Party Age
47
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha.C
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
43
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Savitha
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Delivery of Property
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ordered the delivery of the property affected.
Evidence:
Delivery of the property affected. Delivery affected. Petition is closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 04/09/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 04/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Thu, 04/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenivasan vs Ashraf regarding execution of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won