Case Summary
The case involves a suit for fixation of boundary and other consequential reliefs between the plaintiffs and defendants. The parties agreed to settle the matter out of court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The terms of the compromise shall form part of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed as per the terms of the compromise, with the boundaries of the properties being fixed based on a mutually accepted survey sketch. There shall be no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and that the terms were lawful.
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and that the terms were lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and that the terms were lawful.
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and that the terms were lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The court is also of the opinion that a decree in terms of the compromise can be passed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise. The terms of the compromise shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamoni Kunjamma
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jithash P.R.
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jinesh P.R.
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vino Ramesh alias
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohanachandran Elyidom
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Survey sketch prepared by N. M. Soman, Head Surveyor (Retired), commission report dated 27.01.2006
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.C. Eldho
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jijo Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Malleenathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rathi K.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil R. Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aneesh James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- O.V. Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.V. Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The survey sketch prepared by N. M. Soman, Head Surveyor (Retired), in the above case forming part of the commission report dated 27.01.2006 is mutually accepted by the petitioners herein as final.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankamoni Kunjamma et al vs Vino Ramesh alias et al regarding fixation of boundary and other consequential reliefs
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamoni Kunjamma et al vs Vino Ramesh alias et al regarding fixation of boundary and other consequential reliefs
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement