Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Thampan and Indira, have filed a suit against the defendant, Panchaman, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration. The court noted that both parties were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as both parties were absent.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to default.
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to default.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to default.
Plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to default.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 29th day of July, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thampan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Indira
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Panchaman
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Harish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sureshkumar. C.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration u/s 26 u/O IV Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thampan et al vs Panchaman regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Thampan et al vs Panchaman regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.