Case Summary
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for realisation of money. Both parties were represented in court but were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendant despite sufficient opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thakanamani
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lathakumari
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Krishnan S.Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Haripriya S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Latheesh R. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thakanamani vs Lathakumari regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Thakanamani vs Lathakumari regarding realisation of money