Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 491/2025

Case between T. T. Stanley vs Jude Thadeaus regarding mandatory injunction

Court
The Principal Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T. T. Stanley filed a suit against his brother Jude Thadeaus seeking a mandatory injunction to remove a structure obstructing a pathway. The case involves property rights and previous legal disputes regarding the use of the pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for an injunction, stating that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case or show that he would suffer irreparable injury. The interim injunction previously granted was lifted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for an injunction, stating that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case or show that he would suffer irreparable injury. The interim injunction previously granted was lifted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to demonstrate a prima facie case supporting the need for an injunction.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to demonstrate a prima facie case supporting the need for an injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to an order of injunction as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I am of the opinion that the petition is to be dismissed. The petition is dismissed. The ad-interim injunction order granted in favour of the petitioner is lifted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T. T. Stanley
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jude Thadeaus
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N Mandadan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandhya C. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shiju Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manu T.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anaina Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought a temporary prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to an order of injunction as sought for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The Commission report was referred to in the judgment to assess the construction and its impact on the right of way.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T. T. Stanley vs Jude Thadeaus regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between T. T. Stanley vs Jude Thadeaus regarding mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won