Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 392/2023

Case between Syamala T G et al vs M. Mohankumar regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the plaintiffs Syamala T G, Byju D, and Vijish D against the defendant M. Mohankumar. The matter was settled in mediation, and a compromise was reached among the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in accordance with its terms. The plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of court fees as per law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee, if any, as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in accordance with its terms. The plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of court fees as per law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties entered into a compromise voluntarily which was found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties entered into a compromise voluntarily which was found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Parties entered into compromise voluntarily and signed by all parties. Hence mediation report accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syamala T G
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Byju D
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijish D
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Mohankumar
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anoop P.N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh peter
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandeep Sudhakaran M.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rohit Lobo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence mediation report accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to refund of court fee, if any, as per law.
Evidence:
Plaintiff entitled to refund of court fee, if any, as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Syamala T G et al vs M. Mohankumar regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Syamala T G et al vs M. Mohankumar regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won