Case Summary
Sween Varghese is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that a service agreement is null and void. The defendants include Alight Solutions and NGA HR India Private Limited, who are contesting the claims related to arbitration proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The second respondent is directed to produce the original service agreement for specialized training dated 18.04.2023.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed, directing the second respondent to produce the original service agreement for specialized training dated 18.04.2023.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The document is deemed necessary for proper adjudication of the suit.
The document is deemed necessary for proper adjudication of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the said document is necessary for the proper adjudication of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, (1) Petition is allowed. (2) 2nd respondent is directed to produce the original service agreement for specialized training dated 18.04.2023.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sween Varghese
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alight Solutions
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NGA HR India Private Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lal K Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Luxy T A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Snita Rose Benchamin
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anupama
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adithya S Puthezhath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anzil Salim
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bobby M Sekhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The second respondent is directed to produce the original service agreement for specialized training dated 18.04.2023.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed. 2nd respondent is directed to produce the original service agreement for specialized training dated 18.04.2023.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Service Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court required the production of the original service agreement dated 18.04.2023 for proper adjudication of the suit.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Arbitration clause dispute
Case Code
Case between Sween Varghese vs Alight Solutions et al regarding a declaration of the service agreement's validity
Case Code Year
Case between Sween Varghese vs Alight Solutions et al regarding a declaration of the service agreement's validity