Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1064/2023

Case between Swarna M A vs Usha et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Swarna M A and Sophy Mol as plaintiffs against Usha, Valsa, Valli, and Shivapriya as defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs were continuously absent and not ready to proceed with the case. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs were continuously absent and not ready to proceed with the case. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Plaintiff absent, no proof affidavit seen filed. Plaintiff absent continuously and not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Swarna M A
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sophy Mol
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsa
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valli
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shivapriya
Party Age
12
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T R S Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deena Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa R Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akshay Joseph Adhikaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sona Maria Paulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thushar Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not interested in proceeding.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Plaintiff absent, no proof affidavit seen filed. Plaintiff absent continuously and not ready for evidence. Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Swarna M A vs Usha et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Swarna M A vs Usha et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won