Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 727/2017

Case between Suvarnan.S vs Harilal.G. regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-05
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 06/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Suvarnan.S and Sukhilal.S, filed a suit against the defendant, Harilal.G., seeking a fixation of boundary and injunction. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiffs were absent and did not present any evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiffs were absent and did not present any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear in court and provide evidence for their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs failed to appear in court and provide evidence for their case.

Judgment Evidence:

As the plaintiff absent and not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suvarnan.S
Party Age
56
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sukhilal.S
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Harilal.G.
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Maranadu G. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athulya Manohar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
I.Stevenson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Moti.V.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff requested for Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suvarnan.S vs Harilal.G. regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Suvarnan.S vs Harilal.G. regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 06/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won