Case Summary
Plaintiff Suresh filed a suit seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants to prevent obstruction of water supply and to mandate shifting of water connection to his name.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing water supply to the plaintiff and directed defendants to shift the water connection to plaintiff's name.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to support his case, and defendants opted to remain exparte.
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to support his case, and defendants opted to remain exparte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to support his case, and defendants opted to remain exparte.
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to support his case, and defendants opted to remain exparte.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs has proved his case with cogent and reliable evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed to restrain defendants from obstructing water availability and to mandate shifting of water connection to plaintiff's name.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o. Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Secretary, Society Reg. No. 221/2002
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Rep. by Madathil Haridasan, S/o. Thami
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- President, Society Reg. No. 221/2002
- Relation
- Rep. by Chitteppurath Dasan, S/o. Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balan
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o. Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Partition Deed No. 1188/2015, Consent letter, Possession certificate, Copy of Petition, Notice from Vettom Gramapanchayath, Tax receipt
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suresh. A. Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from obstructing water availability
Evidence:
The suit is decreed to restrain defendants from obstructing water availability.
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing defendants to shift the water connection to plaintiff's name
Evidence:
The suit is decreed to mandate shifting of water connection to plaintiff's name.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved plaintiffs' share in the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Consent letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented the consent for shifting water connection
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Possession Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of possession
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
Copy of Petition
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for petition filed with authorities
Reference:
A4
Document Type:
Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the mediation process
Reference:
A6 & A7
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented tax payment
Reference:
A8
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suresh vs Secretary et al regarding water connection dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh vs Secretary et al regarding water connection dispute