Case Summary
This case involves Suraj RamaChandran and Geethu Santhosh J as plaintiffs against Vanajavally as the defendant regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction. The parties reached a settlement during mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The mediation agreement except clause 5 shall form part of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed as per the terms of the mediation agreement that the defendant has no objection to the plaintiff's possession and ownership of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were deemed lawful and accepted by the court.
The terms of the mediation agreement were deemed lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were deemed lawful and accepted by the court.
The terms of the mediation agreement were deemed lawful and accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
I have perused the terms of the mediation agreement. I am convinced that the parties entered into the said agreement voluntarily. The terms of the agreement except clause 5 are lawful and hence it is accepted.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per the terms of the mediation agreement.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suraj RamaChandran
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geethu Santhosh J
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vanajavally
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement from Mediation Center.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiju Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sachu Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu T.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manoj Kumar M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as per the terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as per the terms of the mediation agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The document confirms the ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property owned by the plaintiff.
Reference:
No.1665/2021
Document Type:
FDR
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The document reflects the deposit for covering conversion charges related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
No.12190300218158
Document Type:
Mediation Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court referred to this report as part of the validated terms of the mediation agreement.
Reference:
Document Type:
Mediation Agreement
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The agreement established the conditions under which the suit was resolved.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suraj RamaChandran vs Vanajavally regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Suraj RamaChandran vs Vanajavally regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement