Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 898/2025

Case between Sunithakumari et al vs Rathikumari et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-05-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Sunithakumari and Remany seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants Rathikumari and Kichu Sunil. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property until a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from trespassing.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property until a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and the building comprised therein and from interfering with the peaceful residence of plaintiff therein until 12/06/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunithakumari
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Remany
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rathikumari
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kichu Sunil
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Poonthura Tharif. B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property and interfering with the peaceful residence of the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and the building comprised therein and from interfering with the peaceful residence of plaintiff therein until 12/06/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of reviewing the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunithakumari et al vs Rathikumari et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sunithakumari et al vs Rathikumari et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won