Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff, Sunitha, for an injunction against the defendants, Sureshkumar and July. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as both sides were absent and no affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of evidence.
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunitha
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sureshkumar
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- July
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Krishna kumar S. Ancy Rajeev, L.Radhika
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kallada M. Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunitha vs Sureshkumar et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sunitha vs Sureshkumar et al regarding injunction