Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 132/2022

Case between Sunitha Suresh et al vs Vinod Marcilin et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Sunitha Suresh and others were involved in a civil suit against the defendants Vinod Marcilin and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' absence. The plaintiffs were directed to appear and submit their intentions regarding the case but failed to do so.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' absence. The plaintiffs were directed to appear and submit their intentions regarding the case but failed to do so.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunitha Suresh
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parameswaranmenon
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subhadra Mannadiar
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sidharth S
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soorya S
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod Marcilin
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoob Habel
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roopesh K.R
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anthony C.L
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.T.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mareena Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Denizen Komath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Diastus Komath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, the Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunitha Suresh et al vs Vinod Marcilin et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Sunitha Suresh et al vs Vinod Marcilin et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won