Case Summary
The plaintiff Sunilkumar filed a suit for fixation of boundary and injunction against the defendants Anitha and Prakash. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the court proceedings. The case was scheduled for the appearance of the plaintiff, but since he did not show up, it was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prakash
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- H/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Sheejakumari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thattamala M.Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent, suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunilkumar vs Anitha et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sunilkumar vs Anitha et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.