Case Summary
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed a petition to restore a case. The respondent, Rajani, was involved as well.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for restoration was dismissed due to costs not being paid.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed due to non-payment of costs.
The petition was dismissed due to non-payment of costs.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed due to non-payment of costs.
The petition was dismissed due to non-payment of costs.
Supporting Evidence
Costs not paid so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunil Kumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajani
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.L.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petition filed to restore the petition on file.
Evidence:
Costs not paid so far. Hence petition dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunil Kumar vs Rajani regarding restoration of petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sunil Kumar vs Rajani regarding restoration of petition