Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 14/2020

Case between Sunil J Chungath vs Baiju Y.P. regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Court
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-06
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 04/06/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunil J Chungath, represented by his mother, sought the eviction of tenant Baiju Y.P. for failure to pay rent. The case revolves around arrears of rent and the terms of the rental agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the eviction of the respondent and ordering him to surrender possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the eviction of the respondent and ordering him to surrender possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the tenant's default in payment of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved the tenant's default in payment of rent.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the petitioner shows that the respondent has committed default in paying the monthly rent.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed and the following orders are issued against the respondent. The respondent/tenant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the landlord/petitioner under Section 11(ii)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil J Chungath
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alfo Joy
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baiju Y.P.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Power of Attorney, Office Copy of the lawyer notice, Postal A/D card, Reply notice, Duly certified copy of computer generated print of form 26A5 of the petitioner.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacob George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vivek George J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jomy Job
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Siril John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed and the respondent/tenant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the landlord/petitioner under Section 11(ii)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the petitioner in favour of PW1.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanding the arrears of rent and asking for vacating the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal A/D Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The response from the respondent to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Print out of form 26A5
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To prove the fact that the monthly rent payable by the respondent is Rs. 14,586.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunil J Chungath vs Baiju Y.P. regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Case Code Year
Case between Sunil J Chungath vs Baiju Y.P. regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Financial liability - dishonoured cheque

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 02/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 04/06/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown