Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.73/2018

Case between Suma vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding injunction of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suma filed a suit for injunction regarding a money claim. The matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The compromise between the parties was accepted, and the suit was decreed in its terms. There was no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees paid by the Plaintiffs to be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The compromise between the parties was accepted, and the suit was decreed in its terms. There was no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a settlement through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suma
Party Age
40
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivaprasad
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gireesh Kumar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raji
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suseela
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.Gopalakrishnapilla
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P. Gopalakrishnapilla
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms
Evidence:
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suma vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding injunction of money
Case Code Year
Case between Suma vs Gireesh Kumar et al regarding injunction of money

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 04/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won