Case Summary
The petitioner Sulochana filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The court found the reasons provided by the petitioner insufficient and dismissed the restoration petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to restore the suit due to insufficient reasons provided by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The reasons stated in the petition were not found to be sufficient for restoring the suit.
The reasons stated in the petition were not found to be sufficient for restoring the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The reasons stated in the petition were not found to be sufficient for restoring the suit.
The reasons stated in the petition were not found to be sufficient for restoring the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The prescription itself is not clear and has not stated anything with report to the illness, hurt effected by the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, RPIA is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulochana
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balakrishna Kurup
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Padmanabha Kurup
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rathnakara Kurup
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathyavathi
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Premalatha
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical prescription to prove her case.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Rajesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Akhilesh. P.T
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Law Firm
- Legal Aid Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Restoration of the suit which was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
This itself shown that the reason to restore the suit is not sufficient and there are no bonafide to allow the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Medical prescription
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced by the petitioner to prove the reason for restoring the suit.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulochana vs Balakrishna Kurup et al regarding restoration of a suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Sulochana vs Balakrishna Kurup et al regarding restoration of a suit dismissed for default.