Case Summary
Sulfi.S and Jafarudheen are the plaintiffs filing a petition to restore a previous case. The defendants include Fathahudheen and a local samithi.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner without any representation.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was absent at the hearing.
The petitioner was absent at the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was absent at the hearing.
The petitioner was absent at the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent no representation. R2 absent represented. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulfi.S
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jafarudheen
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathahudheen
- Party Age
- 42
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Umayanalloor Padasekhara Nellupadaka Samithi
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amarjith Khan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun. R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to absence of petitioner.
Evidence:
Petitioner absent no representation. R2 absent represented. Petitioner called absent no representation on his part. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulfi.S vs Fathahudheen regarding petition for restoring the petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Sulfi.S vs Fathahudheen regarding petition for restoring the petition.