Case Summary
The plaintiffs Sukumari and Ajith are involved in a case against the defendants Jameela, Faizal, T.V.Rasiaby, and Beeran. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was repeatedly absent and showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and failure to show interest in the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the plaintiff not interested in prosecuting the case as there were repeated absences despite directions.
The court found the plaintiff not interested in prosecuting the case as there were repeated absences despite directions.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the plaintiff not interested in prosecuting the case as there were repeated absences despite directions.
The court found the plaintiff not interested in prosecuting the case as there were repeated absences despite directions.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff continuously absent inspite of repeated directions. Today also he remained absent, even after issuance of notice to plaintiffs counsel.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence this court is of view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sukumari
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajith
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jameela
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faizal
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.V.Rasiaby @ Shemi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beeran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sabu P. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.N. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sruthy M.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ashwini G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nirmalan K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of interest in prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sukumari et al vs Jameela et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Sukumari et al vs Jameela et al regarding default dismissal of suit.