Case Summary
The plaintiff, Sukumaran, aged 77 years, and the defendant, Sundaran, aged about 55 years, were involved in a suit that was finally heard on October 10, 2025. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the Basic Court Fee despite repeated directions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's non-compliance with fee requirements.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the Basic Court Fee despite repeated directions.
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the Basic Court Fee despite repeated directions.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the Basic Court Fee despite repeated directions.
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the Basic Court Fee despite repeated directions.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the Basic Court Fee despite repeated directions.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sundaran
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Saju V Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to BCF not being remitted.
Evidence:
Hence suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sukumaran vs Sundaran regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Sukumaran vs Sundaran regarding suit rejection