Case Summary
The plaintiff, Sujith Sukumaran, filed a suit against Anilkumar and Monisha V for the recovery of money paid towards a loan that was never arranged. The plaintiff alleges that after transferring a total of 45,250/- for processing expenses, the defendants avoided contact and failed to repay the amount.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.47,284/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the claim for the recovery of the amount along with interest. The defendants were ordered to pay the specified sum and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving his case with substantial evidence.
The plaintiff succeeded in proving his case with substantial evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1 to A7 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.47,284/- (Rupees Forty Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Eighty Four Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendants and their assets with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sujith Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anilkumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Monisha V
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Transaction details of Mrs. Minita Sajeev at South Indian Bank, Copy of screenshot of details of Google Pay transaction, Transaction details of Sri. Jyothir Adithya S at Canara Bank, Copy of Screenshot details Paytm transaction, Office copy of Advocate Notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgement Card
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chandrasenan S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Parvathy C Senan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smitha Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.47,284/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum
Evidence:
Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.47,284/- (Rupees Forty Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Eighty Four Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendants and their assets with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Transaction Details
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transaction details of a bank account linked to the plaintiff's loan application
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Screenshot of Google Pay transaction
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the google pay transaction made by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Transaction Details
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transaction details of another bank account linked to the loan application
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Screenshot of Paytm transaction
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the Paytm transaction made by the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Advocate Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the legal notice sent to the defendants
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt confirming the sending of the advocate notice
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card acknowledging receipt of the legal notice by the defendants
Reference:
Ext.A7
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Sujith Sukumaran vs Anilkumar et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Sujith Sukumaran vs Anilkumar et al regarding realisation of money.