Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 956/2018

Case between Sujatha vs Suvarnnan et al regarding injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-09-24
Duration
approximately-7 years
Case Closed
Wed, 09/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Sujatha filed a suit for injunction against the defendants Suvarnnan, Sudheesh Khanna, Sasi, and Sasikala. The subject matter of the suit was settled between the parties in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreed upon in mediation. Court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded, and there is no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees refunded
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreed upon in mediation. Court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded, and there is no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the compromise.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suvarnnan
Party Age
59
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudheesh Khanna
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasi
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikala
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Panambil S. Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ram Manoj A.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.S. Anogith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms as the parties entered into a compromise.
Evidence:
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sujatha vs Suvarnnan et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sujatha vs Suvarnnan et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won