Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Suja Murukeshan to restore a suit. The petitioner was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal.
The petitioner failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal.
The petitioner failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is continuously absent and no representation as well.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for non prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suja Murukeshan @Suja.T
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishalamani
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajee Rajappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for non prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for non prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suja Murukeshan @Suja.T vs Vishalamani regarding restoration of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Suja Murukeshan @Suja.T vs Vishalamani regarding restoration of suit.