Case Summary
The plaintiff, Suja Murukeshan, filed a case for a permanent prohibitory injunction which was dismissed for default due to her illness. She filed a petition to restore the suit which was subsequently dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The applications IA 01/2025 and RP 224/2025 were dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence or explanation for the delay in restoration.
The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence or explanation for the delay in restoration.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing a petition to restore the suit within the time prescribed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA 01/2025 and RP 224/2025 are dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suja Murukeshan @ Suja.T
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishalamani
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajee Rajappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Jayachandra Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Condonation of delay in filing RP No. 224/2025 and restoration of the suit.
Evidence:
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is devoid of merit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020