Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 501/2019

Case between Sugathan vs Raghavan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit was filed by the plaintiffs, Sugathan and Priya, for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Raghavan. The matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The compromise between the parties is accepted, and the suit is decreed in its terms. Court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees paid by the Plaintiffs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The compromise between the parties is accepted, and the suit is decreed in its terms. Court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a compromise during mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a compromise during mediation.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sugathan
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Priya
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raghavan
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathee Devi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Sudha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Krishna Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Unnikrishnan S.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adarsh S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sugathan vs Raghavan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sugathan vs Raghavan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won