Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EA. 218/2023 in EP. No. 04/2020

Case between Sudha et al vs Sivadasan Pillai regarding Execution Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration
approximately-2 years 22 days
Case Closed
Tue, 09/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sudha and others as petitioners/decree holders against Sivadasan Pillai as the counter petitioner/judgment debtor. The petition was filed to restore an execution petition that was previously dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution application was allowed and the execution petition was restored on file, as the respondent did not file any objection and remained absent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Execution application allowed. Execution Petition restored on file.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The execution application was allowed and the execution petition was restored on file, as the respondent did not file any objection and remained absent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners were granted an opportunity to proceed with their execution petition due to lack of objection from the respondents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners were granted an opportunity to proceed with their execution petition due to lack of objection from the respondents.
Supporting Evidence
For the reason stated in the accompanying affidavit I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the Execution Petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence in the interest of justice Execution application allowed. Execution Petition restored on file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudha
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Girija
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suraj
Party Age
51
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sivadasan Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Parippally R. Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution application allowed.
Evidence:
Hence in the interest of justice Execution application allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudha et al vs Sivadasan Pillai regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sudha et al vs Sivadasan Pillai regarding Execution Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 08/23/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won