Case Summary
Sudarsana Babu filed a suit against Geethamma for the realisation of money. The plaintiff was absent for the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not made any representation.
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not made any representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not made any representation.
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not made any representation.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not made any representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. No representation. Today also no representation of plaintiff. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudarsana Babu
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geethamma
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Subrahmaniyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Sudarsana Babu vs Geethamma regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Sudarsana Babu vs Geethamma regarding realisation of money