Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 739/2015

Case between Subramanian.P vs Krishnadas.P et al regarding mandatory injunction

Court
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Jomy Anu Isaac
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-9 years
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Subramanian.P filed a suit against defendants Krishnadas.P and Sajila regarding a mandatory injunction to remove a granite wall and soil that obstructed water flow onto his property. The defendants countered that their construction did not violate any permits.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as it found no evidence to support the plaintiff's claims regarding obstruction of natural water flow.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as it found no evidence to support the plaintiff's claims regarding obstruction of natural water flow.
Key Reasoning:
No evidence substantiated the plaintiff's claims regarding the obstruction of water flow.
Why Defendant Won:
No evidence substantiated the plaintiff's claims regarding the obstruction of water flow.
Supporting Evidence
It is found that there is no obligation for the defendants to the plaintiff and there is no evidence of the direction of natural flow of water.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, costs are not ordered.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subramanian.P
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnadas.P
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajila
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Janmam Sale deed No. 281/85, Janmam sale deed No. 4154/97, various petitions filed by Subramanian.P before authorities.
Defendants Documents
Covering letter issued by Secretary Feroke Municipality to Krishnadas, various building permits and plans.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Premdeep Mahesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.S. Murali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shemie Jithin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff requested to dismantle the granite stone wall and remove soil to restore water flow.
Evidence:
Hence it is found that there is no obligation for the defendants to the plaintiff and there is no evidence of the direction of natural flow of water.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Janmam sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of plaint A schedule property by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1, Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of land tax payments for plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3, Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaints filed by the plaintiff regarding the flooding and obstruction issues.
Reference:
Ext.A5 to Ext.A9
Document Type: Notices from Secretary Feroke Municipality
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official notices regarding the construction and complaints affecting plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A11 to Ext.A14
Document Type: Pattam Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of plaint B schedule property by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B3, Ext.B4
Document Type: Covering letter from Secretary Feroke Municipality
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Correspondence relevant to the construction disputes.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: True copy of council resolution
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Details municipal council decisions affecting the property issues.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reports submitted by the advocate commissioner related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C2, Ext.C3
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Visual evidence relevant to the construction and property conditions.
Reference:
Ext.B7 to Ext.B20
Document Type: Letters and notices from Secretary Feroke Municipality
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Additional documentation regarding the dispute and related resolutions.
Reference:
Ext.X1 to Ext.X4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subramanian.P vs Krishnadas.P et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Subramanian.P vs Krishnadas.P et al regarding mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 04/11/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won