Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.309/2019

Case between Subramanian vs Santha et al regarding balance court fee and suit rejection.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-13
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subramanian filed a suit against Santha and others regarding an issue related to balance court fees. The court rejected the suit due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee. The court emphasized adherence to procedural rules.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee. The court emphasized adherence to procedural rules.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected based on non-remittance of the required court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected based on non-remittance of the required court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted. Suit rejected U/o. 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not remitted. Suit rejected U/o. 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subramanian
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Achuthan
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Appu
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ani
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shibu Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K M Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saji Sankaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Balance Court Fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted. Suit rejected U/o. 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subramanian vs Santha et al regarding balance court fee and suit rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between Subramanian vs Santha et al regarding balance court fee and suit rejection.

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won