Case Summary
Subina.K. is the decree holder and Hareesh is the judgment debtor in this execution petition. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed for default due to absence and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
ORDER Decree Holder absent. No representation. No step taken. Not comply order. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subina.K.
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hareesh
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.R.Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Injakkal.D.Pramod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Execution Petition filed by the Decree Holder for final hearing.
Evidence:
Decree Holder absent. No representation. No step taken. Not comply order. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subina.K. vs Hareesh regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Subina.K. vs Hareesh regarding execution petition