Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1569/2016

Case between Subhash Babu vs Suresh Babu regarding an interim application.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration
approximately-8 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Subhash Babu as the plaintiff and Suresh Babu as the defendant regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the application and appointed an advocate commissioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the interim application and appointed an advocate commissioner to assist in preparing a report and plan for passing a preliminary decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the interim application and appointed an advocate commissioner to assist in preparing a report and plan for passing a preliminary decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant had no objection to allowing the interim application.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard both sides. Defendant has no objection in allowing the IA.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for preparing report and plan for the purpose of passing preliminary decree, this IA is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subhash Babu
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Bhuvanachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Jayasankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Smt. Riya C/o. Adv. Dileep Sathyan
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The IA is allowed for preparing a report and plan for the purpose of passing a preliminary decree.
Evidence:
Hence, for preparing report and plan for the purpose of passing preliminary decree, this IA is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an advocate commissioner and a surveyor to prepare a report and plan for passing a preliminary decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subhash Babu vs Suresh Babu regarding an interim application.
Case Code Year
Case between Subhash Babu vs Suresh Babu regarding an interim application.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won