Case Summary
Subair, aged 70, filed a suit against Sundaram Finance Limited for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff decided not to proceed with the matter further, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed and settled, with both parties bearing their respective costs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subair
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sundaram Finance Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, Sundaram Finance Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.A. Abhilash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S.Russel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit is for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subair vs Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Subair vs Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.