Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Subaida P M and others, are involved in a civil suit against the Edapally Service Co-operative Bank and its president. The case was resolved through mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the mediation agreement to be lawful and decreed the suit according to its terms. The plaintiffs are also entitled to a refund of court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subaida P M
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Zahida P M
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Safeer P M
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Edapally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The President, Edapally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jayabal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepu T B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jijo M P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mazin Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kelwin Simon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Yedhukrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Devika S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anu Rose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M R Alphy George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subaida P M et al vs Edapally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al regarding mediation agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Subaida P M et al vs Edapally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al regarding mediation agreement
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement