Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank Of India as the plaintiff and Mr. Subeesh Ramesh as the defendant. The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to remit the balance court fee. No enlargement petition was filed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank Of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Subeesh Ramesh
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V K Hema
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gowri A H
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arunima N R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr. Subeesh Ramesh regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr. Subeesh Ramesh regarding rejection of plaint