Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 878 / 2024

Case between State Bank of India, RACPC- II, Ernakulam represented by its Manager (SARC), Frederic Jose vs Jibin Jude, Jude O A regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, represented by its Manager, filed a suit against defendants Jibin Jude and Jude O A. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the matter.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not pursue the case, resulting in dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not pursue the case, resulting in dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not press the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India, RACPC- II, Ernakulam represented by its Manager (SARC), Frederic Jose
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jibin Jude
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jude O A
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Natraj K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K M Raphy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bristo S Pariyaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not pressed the suit. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India, RACPC- II, Ernakulam represented by its Manager (SARC), Frederic Jose vs Jibin Jude, Jude O A regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India, RACPC- II, Ernakulam represented by its Manager (SARC), Frederic Jose vs Jibin Jude, Jude O A regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won