Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 376/2024

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Sreerag. S regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India is the plaintiff, represented by its Chief Manager, while Mr. Sreerag. S is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to present or prepare for exparte evidence despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present or ready to provide necessary evidence. This dismissal was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present or ready to provide necessary evidence. This dismissal was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence as required by the court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence as required by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present or ready for exparte evidence despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff not being present or ready for exparte evidence despite innumerous chances.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Sreerag. S
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. K Hema
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arunima N.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gowri A.H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T. K Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Sreedevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Chithra R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.R Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreerekha K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Sreerag. S regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Sreerag. S regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won