Case Summary
The petitioners, Sri.Sadananda Naik and others, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Smt. Sakeena, due to her non-compliance with a previous rent order. The court determined that the respondent failed to comply with the order and directed her to vacate the premises.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent did not comply with the required rent control order and thus, the court has taken measures to stop further proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide sufficient cause for non-compliance.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 3/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri.Sadananda Naik
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt. Sreedevi. V.Shenoi
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. S. Sreenivasa Naik
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Sakeena
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance of the order
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajan Mannali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhi K. Pai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreeni S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sasikala V.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arati Prakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all further proceedings and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri.Sadananda Naik et al vs Smt. Sakeena regarding non-compliance of rent control order
Case Code Year
Case between Sri.Sadananda Naik et al vs Smt. Sakeena regarding non-compliance of rent control order