Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 263/2021

Case between Sri. Subeesh Nath P. vs Sri. Adithyan C.J. regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sri. Subeesh Nath P. filed a suit against Sri. Adithyan C.J. for default. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and no representation was made.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. Subeesh Nath P.
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Adithyan C.J.
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhusoodanan S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
M/s. Alkera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rohini V. Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
M/s. Alkera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.D. Suni
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
M/s. Alkera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lipi Mol G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
M/s. Alkera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vincy Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
M/s. Alkera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajan Varghese M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
M/s. Alkera

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and no steps taken.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri. Subeesh Nath P. vs Sri. Adithyan C.J. regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sri. Subeesh Nath P. vs Sri. Adithyan C.J. regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won