Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 820/2020

Case between Sri. Joseph Edward vs Shamon P.Y et al regarding declaration of title, possession and consequential injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-09
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 08/09/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sri. Joseph Edward, is seeking a declaration of title and possession over property previously owned by his late father, claiming that the defendants have no rights over it. The defendants, Shamon P.Y and Ani Kunjappan, argue that the plaintiff has no legal title to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff, finding that he failed to establish the identity of the plaint schedule property as claimed. Therefore, the relief sought by the plaintiff was not granted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff, finding that he failed to establish the identity of the plaint schedule property as claimed. Therefore, the relief sought by the plaintiff was not granted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not establish the identity of the plaint schedule property with that described in the relevant Sale deed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not establish the identity of the plaint schedule property with that described in the relevant Sale deed.
Supporting Evidence
The identification of the property was an essential aspect that had to be established in order to have sustained the suit in favour of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. Joseph Edward
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shamon P.Y
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ani Kunjappan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 3791/1980, Certified copy of the Sale Deed No. 5489/1980, Certified copy of Order in E.A No. 809/2006 and E.A No. 810/2006 in E.P No. 312/1999 in O.S No. 580/1994, Certified copy of Sale Deed No.6129/2007, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 672/2010, Encumbrance Certificate from 01.01.2006 to 16.06.2020
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George A Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Sreedev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajai John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.C Thomas Adhikaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ann Mary Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jithin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a declaration of title over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that these issues are to be found against the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants' interference.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that these issues are to be found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 3791/1980, establishing property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 5489/1980, relevant for establishing the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Order in E.A No. 809/2006 and E.A No. 810/2006, confirming the plaintiff's rights.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 6129/2007, indicating transfer of property rights.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 672/2010, showing subsequent property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Encumbrance Certificate from 01.01.2006 to 16.06.2020, pertinent for property establishment.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri. Joseph Edward vs Shamon P.Y et al regarding declaration of title, possession and consequential injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sri. Joseph Edward vs Shamon P.Y et al regarding declaration of title, possession and consequential injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 12/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/09/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won