Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 231/2025

Case between Sreevidya Sunilkumar vs Sunilkumar M. R. regarding property use

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Sreevidya Sunilkumar as the plaintiff and Sunilkumar M. R. as the defendant. The case concerns the use of specific properties and the restrictions placed by the defendant on the plaintiff's access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court restrained the respondents from obstructing the petitioners' use of the specified properties until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court restrained the respondents from obstructing the petitioners' use of the specified properties until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that there was a need to ensure the petitioner's access to the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that there was a need to ensure the petitioner's access to the property.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that there was a need to ensure the petitioner's access to the property.

Judgment Evidence:

Respondents are restrained from obstructs the petitioners use of B schedule property, and petitioners use of A schedule property and closing the entrance portion of B schedule, A schedule pathways until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreevidya Sunilkumar
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunilkumar M. R.
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. V. Eldo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. A. Bejoykumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioners use of B schedule property, and petitioners use of A schedule property and closing the entrance portion of B schedule, A schedule pathways until further orders.
Evidence:
Respondents are restrained from obstructs the petitioners use of B schedule property, and petitioners use of A schedule property and closing the entrance portion of B schedule, A schedule pathways until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreevidya Sunilkumar vs Sunilkumar M. R. regarding property use
Case Code Year
Case between Sreevidya Sunilkumar vs Sunilkumar M. R. regarding property use

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won