Case Summary
Sreenivasan (late), represented by legal heir Pushpavalli. K, is involved in a case against multiple respondents for the hearing of a petition. The court allowed the interim application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Interim Application
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the interim application as the costs were paid. The order was pronounced in open court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Costs paid
Costs paid
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Costs paid
Costs paid
Supporting Evidence
Costs paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pushpavalli. K
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N. Sameema
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.M. Rubeena
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariya Sahida
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cheriya Arakkal Ayishabi
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cheriya Arakkal Sakkeer Hussain
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Rajendra Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA allowed
Evidence:
Costs paid. Hence, IA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Interim Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreenivasan (late) et al vs N. Sameema et al regarding costs
Case Code Year
Case between Sreenivasan (late) et al vs N. Sameema et al regarding costs