Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by Sabu R and others, filed a suit against the defendants including M/s Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha and Tripunithura Municipality. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation, resulting in a default judgment.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide any proof, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide any proof, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide any proof, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide any proof, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The case was included in the list for final as early as on 29/03/2025 after giving the opportunities for the pre-trial steps. Still no intimation from the side of the plaintiff yet.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sree Panakkattu Devi, Thammandi Temple Complex
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabu R
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o K.A.Rajan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sadasivan G
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Govindan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeevan V.A
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o Ashokan T.K
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajeev A.P
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o Padmanaban
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tripunithura Municipality
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Secretary, Tripunithura Municipality
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.T.Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jose Paul Thottam
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fathima Razak
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Benraj K.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham P George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sree Panakkattu Devi et al vs M/s Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sree Panakkattu Devi et al vs M/s Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al regarding dismissal for default